Search for: "US v. Rodriguez"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2025, 6:00 am
Plaintiff also testified that she was not aware of the defective desk leg until after her accident, and that none of the students who used the desk ever reported any defect to her (see Velocci v Stop & Shop, 188 AD3d 436, 439 [1st Dept 2020]).Nevertheless, defendants failed to establish prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint, as they did not sustain their burden of demonstrating that they lacked constructive notice of the allegedly defective… [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
appeared first on The Rodriguez Law Group. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
See Tsai-Yi Yang v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
The Supreme Court also emphasized that A recognized the defendant as someone who used to play basketball. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:41 am
Rodriguez, supra. . . . [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:55 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:04 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
” [Part I, here] [Part II, here] [Part III, here] [Part IV, here] [Part V, here] [And the piece in full, as a single document, from SSRN] The symposium is organized under the “2018 Symposium: Future of Legal Ed” tag. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 12:19 pm
Rodriguez, supra. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:34 pm
A very tragic case starts us off today: Stephenson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:46 pm
Facts of the Case In the recent (unreported) case of Landry v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:50 am
" Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 9:49 pm
US v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 9:29 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 9:29 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
Indeed, such a motion “is useful in disposing of actions in which the plaintiff . [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:30 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 May 2025, 6:00 am
Dist., 485 US 1034 [1988]).Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to DC 37's fair representation of him. [read post]
8 May 2025, 6:00 am
Dist., 485 US 1034 [1988]).Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to DC 37's fair representation of him. [read post]
