Search for: "US v. Rose" Results 461 - 480 of 2,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “Apple’s New Privacy Requirement: The Impact and the Solution”. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
| Memoriam of US Supreme Court Legend, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (1933 - 2020) | UK patent exams: Essential information for candidates released and FD4/P6 survey results | Can academic peer-review learn something from patent prosecution? [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
That is the question asked by Rose Hughes in her latest post. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am by Eric Goldman
So when the Trump administration characterizes WeChat/TikTok as a threat to US national security, the US implicitly admits that every US online offering threatens EU “national” security because the US’s data hoovering capacity is analogous to China’s. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
A major part of the strategy employed by Ginsburg and the ACLU was using men as plaintiffs to challenge gender-based classifications. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm by Phil Dixon
Within 48 hours of the murder, the defendant called his parents, alleged that the victim had been using the computer, and told them to “clean” it. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am by Sophie Corke
| Keeping up with Dutch patent litigation: Half-year case law review 2020 | Beijing IP Court: let’s talk about short video copyrights | Rick Ross wins legal beef with 50 Cent: the Second Circuit holds that 50 Cent's Publicity Right claim is preempted by the Copyright Act | Copyright, Trademark, International IP, and Trespass: Imapizza LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:52 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 GuestKat Thomas Key discussed the ruling, issued by the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 50 cent v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 1:34 pm by Donald Dinnie
An American court has confirmed that government shutdown orders did not constitute ‘direct physical loss’ that would trigger an indemnity under the commercial insurance held by a group of restaurants (in Rose’s 1 LLC et al v Erie Insurance Exchange). [read post]