Search for: "US v. Snyder" Results 461 - 480 of 841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
One tailored to the particular case must be found, and that can be done only after a discriminating consideration of all information bearing upon an enlightened prediction of the future’ ” (Amodio v Amodio, 70 NY2d 5, 7, quoting Snyder’s Estate v United States, 285 F2d 857, 861). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:28 am by Michigan Estate Planning
This lead to a new (for some of us at least) avenue of planning and caused us to re-think our planning strategies see, Some Family Cottage Strategies in Light of the Klooster Case; my follow up to the Klooster article.Perhaps in response to Klooster and the uncertainty that surrounded its reasoning, and certainly to protect family interests in family-owned residential real estate, the Michigan Legislature passed, and Governor Snyder signed into law in December of 2012, a… [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:28 am by Michigan Estate Planning
This lead to a new (for some of us at least) avenue of planning and caused us to re-think our planning strategies see, Some Family Cottage Strategies in Light of the Klooster Case; my follow up to the Klooster article.Perhaps in response to Klooster and the uncertainty that surrounded its reasoning, and certainly to protect family interests in family-owned residential real estate, the Michigan Legislature passed, and Governor Snyder signed into law in December of 2012, a… [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 1:16 pm by Howard Wasserman
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization links to an amicus brief filed by Westboro Baptist Church (of "God hates [everyone but us]" and Snyder v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 am by Kevin Goldberg
  (I’m guessing that the USPTO examining attorney wasn’t a football fan and thus may not have recognized “Harbowl” as a reference to a Harbaugh v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Suja A. Thomas
Solomon begins with a provocative argument that some of the most important cases in the last four terms of the Supreme Court, including Snyder v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am by Charon QC
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 6:04 am by Brian Wm. Higgins
Almeling, Oxford University Press, 2012           Some forms of intellectual property make headlines from time to time, like the recent Apple v. [read post]