Search for: "USA v. Living" Results 461 - 480 of 1,095
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2016, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
He lived in Dubai with his wife and the child of the marriage, and he worked in Dubai and the USA in aerospace engineering. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
The specialty with regards to the districts is that them being the areas which were highly affected by the thirty year civil war that existed in Sri Lanka causing grave damage to both lives and property of people. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 There are fears Murdoch will try and turn it into a version of his Fox News in the USA. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Next week’s oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Also in the USA, Andrus Nomm, a 36 year old Estonian who lives in the Netherlands, and one of a small group of ex MegaUpload staffers who are facing extradition to the US for involvement in the running of the controversial file-transfer company, pleaded guilty to criminal copyright infringement charges was been sentenced to a year and a day in a US prison. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
Jewel v NSA, First Unitarian Church v NSA, and Smith v Obama in the Ninth Circuit A week after the Wikimedia ruling, the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 1:14 am by Eleonora Rosati
 The author, The Hon Mr Justice Arnold, requires no introduction.According to the publisher's website, this essential handbook for practitioners advising performers, their representatives, exploiters of performers’ rights and their representatives provides an in-depth treatment of performers’ statutory rights under Part II of the 1988 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act and subsequent legislation, together with broad coverage of the legal position of performers… [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 8:19 am by Andres
Why is it that many countries, including the maximalist heaven that is the USA, can live happily with private copying? [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
 Alaska’s stunning beauty shouldn’t impose a straitjacket on those who live there. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:48 am by Jeremy
It dives into the history of the 1909 Copyright Act and the resulting Herbert v Shanley Co. [read post]