Search for: "USA v. Mays et al" Results 461 - 480 of 668
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
The Court refused to hear the appeal brought by the plaintiffs, which consisted of newspaper companies, the ACLU and the Shady Lady Ranch bordello, in Coyote Publishing, Inc. d/b/a High Desert Advocate et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am by John Elwood
Lenge et al. in opposition §  Brief of respondents Audrey Blondin et al. in opposition §  Petitioners’ reply   Title: Stovall v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
(Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents 3M Company et al. as amici curiae in support of respondents.) [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:04 pm by Howard Knopf
This was the decision of Justice Lemieux of the Federal Court in Telewizja Polsat S.A. et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:40 pm by Chris Cheatham
  We now have a lawsuit describing this third scenario: The Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:40 pm by Chris Cheatham
We now have a lawsuit describing this third scenario: The Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The new case denied review was S&M Brands, et al., v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
Badger Catholic, Inc.Docket: 10-731Issue(s): Whether, absent evidence of religious animus, a public institution of higher education that has created a limited public forum to promote its educational mission may refuse to fund a student organization's activities that the organization identifies as religious worship, proselytizing, or inculcation of a particular religious belief.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (7th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners'… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am by stevemehta
  AWARD, INC., et al.,   Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am by Law Lady
APPALACHIAN TECHNICAL COLLEGE, JASPER GEORGIA, In their individual and official capacities, et al., Defendants, JOAN THOMPSON, Vice President, in their individual and official capacities, DR. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
American Airlines et al (CAFC 2009-1450, -1451, -1452, -1469, 2010-1017) precedential The district court, in summary judgment, "held all the claims selected against the appellees to be either invalid or not infringed by the appellees' accused devices. [read post]