Search for: "United Energy Corp. v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm by Kelly
National Football League (1709 Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Omega SA - American lawyers love expensive watches, ABA amicus brief confirms: Costco Wholesale Corp v Omega SA (IPKat) US Trade Marks – Decisions 9th Circuit modifies tests for laches and acquiescence: Seller Agency Council, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:32 pm by Mike Aylward
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department announced that Plains All American Pipeline and several of its operating subsidiaries have agreed to spend approximately $41 million to upgrade 10,420 miles of crude oil pipeline operated in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Panduit Corp., 475 U.S. 809, 811 (1986). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Mfg., Energy, Allied Indus. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:37 pm
Since the statute of limitations is intended to give defendants "the protections of predictability and promptness" (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm by Gary Nitzkin
Instead, the letter specifically states that "should [she] have any questions concerning this matter, please contact your local Consumers Energy office." [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm by Gary Nitzkin
Instead, the letter specifically states that "should [she] have any questions concerning this matter, please contact your local Consumers Energy office. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:29 am by Gary Nitzkin
Instead, the letter specifically states that “should [she] have any questions concerning this matter, please contact your local Consumers Energy office. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:29 am by Gary Nitzkin
Instead, the letter specifically states that “should [she] have any questions concerning this matter, please contact your local Consumers Energy office.” [read post]