Search for: "United States of America v. Test"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 4:27 am
There is a history of overbroad interpretation under laws such as the United States’ Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and this remains a significant concern with similarly vague language in other jurisdictions. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
“Without this legislation, the existence of the broadcast news monitoring industry in the United States is and will remain in jeopardy. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm
Executive Order on Maintaining American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am
On October 23, 1987, the United States Senate held one of the most-controversial votes on a Supreme Court nominee in its history, when it rejected Robert Bork’s appointment. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
Sure issued his decision in Regan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:50 pm
" Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:01 am
Racial distinctions cannot exist in the machinery that selects the officers and lawmakers of the United States; and all citizens of this State and Country are entitled to cast a free and untrammeled ballot in our elections, and if the only material and realistic elections are clothed with the name “primary”, they are equally entitled to vote there. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
” [ii]That rationale has deep roots in America. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:52 am
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:38 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:07 pm
Utah Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow: "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm
That provision empowers the president to deny entry to foreign nationals when entry would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:52 am
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit panel in this case erred by invalidating a patent as indefinite without mentioning 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
