Search for: "United States v. Anthony" Results 461 - 480 of 2,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am by Kathy Darvil
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm by Holland & Hart
By Dora Lane and Anthony Hall One in eight adults in the United States smokes marijuana, according to a 2016 Gallup poll. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Marissa Miller
Perry, the challenge to California Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:53 am by Daniel Clement
The United States Supreme Court ruled that an order prohibiting the removal of a child from a country without the non-custodial parent's consent is enforceable under an international child abduction treaty, In Abbott v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:53 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled that an order prohibiting the removal of a child from a country without the non-custodial parent's consent is enforceable under an international child abduction treaty, In Abbott v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, concluding that he “still think[s] the government’s surplusage argument is pretty silly, but I’m no longer so sure the government’s reading creates an absurd amount of surplusage. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm by Orin Kerr
Justices Breyer and Ginsburg are pretty obvious votes for the mandate, as they dissented in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In the article, the authors argue the United States Supreme Court has interpreted the patent eligibility statute in an unconstitutional manner by allowing judicial exceptions to patent eligibility beyond those specifically included in the statute. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 8:56 am
Legal Times' Tony Mauro has this report on the Supreme Court ruling.On Monday the Supreme Court ruled in Carey v. [read post]