Search for: "United States v. Belt"
Results 461 - 480
of 509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Mary Queen of the Third Millennium, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:01 pm
at *15 (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:53 pm
" Moral of the story: when you turn yourself in for murder in Miami, ask the officer to verify the charges before you are taken away.Judge Schlessinger denied the motion to suppress at trial, and he gets another notch in his belt courtesy of the 3rd DCA.And finally in State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:26 am
The lawyers, led by Shayana Kadidal of the Center for Constitutional Rights, contend that many former Gitmo inmates have continued to suffer severe personal hardship since their release because the United States has not cleared their legal status. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The recent decision in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) is a worrying one both for Defendants and for the legal profession generally. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:20 pm
*Thanks to the CAI Law Reporter for uncovering this gem of a case, Belt v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 3:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
A belt and suspenders approach. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:42 pm
" That phrase came to mind when reading CGCCA's opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Most notably, in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Ketchum v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 2:13 pm
"So the woman who can't name a case other than Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
United States District Judge, John Daniel Tinder, concluded that Wrinkles could not demonstrate prejudice because the jury was not aware of the stun belt. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
United Inns, Inc [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:53 am
Tom F. nondecision by the United States Supreme Court last October. [read post]
