Search for: "United States v. Borders"
Results 461 - 480
of 4,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2019, 2:52 pm
United States, Docket 2018-1206) [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:08 am
Section 929P(b)(2) provide extraterritorial effect for these types actions when certain defined types of conduct take place in the United States or when it takes place outside the United States with a foreseeable effect in the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm
At issue in Christie v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:31 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:01 am
CBP [United States Customs and Border Protection] agents saw them, arrested them, seized their cameras, and deleted their pictures. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:56 pm
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, asset forfeiture unit chief in the southern district of New York, describes the government's investigation in court papers filed in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:48 pm
MARTIN SAN FRANCISCO, September 24 – Today, Renne Public Law Group (RPLG), a San Francisco-based law firm that represents local governments, filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief asking the United States Supreme Court to review City of Boise v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:54 pm
The Ninth Circuit issued an interesting Fourth Amendment decision last week on the subject of reasonable suspicion, in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:22 pm
H.R.5406: To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to improve access to tribal health care by providing for systemic Indian Health Service workforce and funding allocation reforms, and for other purposes.H.R.5412: To provide the right of American Indians born in Canada or the United States to pass the borders of the United States to any individual who is a member, or is eligible to be a member, of a Federally recognized Indian tribe in the… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
Mendoza was to meet the children at the United States/Mexico border, but they did not appear as Ms. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:13 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
The respondent was a United States citizen and would retain sole custody of B.A.S. in Italy, at least until the custody dispute was resolved in the Italian courts; she should be able to return to the United States if the Court ultimately decided in her favor. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
The agencies claim that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 4:58 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:52 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:04 am
We strongly oppose efforts by Republican lawmakers at the state and federal level to undermine Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:04 am
We strongly oppose efforts by Republican lawmakers at the state and federal level to undermine Roe v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:16 am
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:16 am
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
