Search for: "United States v. Brothers" Results 461 - 480 of 1,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2010, 1:57 pm by Barry Herman
  First, Deere asserts that the Commission erred in determining whether “all or substantially all of Deere’s sales in the United States were of North American forage harvesters” as set forth in Bourdeau Bros. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am by MBettman
At issue are these three certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division: What is the statute of limitations for claims of negligent misidentification? [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:40 pm
Davis' sister, Martina Correia, vowed that her brother's case would effect change in the state. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
James Iredell, via The Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States (Artist: C. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix.
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against an adverse decision of the AIT and remitted the case to the Tribunal for reconsideration: see Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 222. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:48 am by admin
Our soldiers swear to defend and protect the United State Constitution when they take their enlistment oaths. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]