Search for: "United States v. Case"
Results 461 - 480
of 78,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2016, 8:56 am
United States. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:43 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:24 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:17 am
United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:17 am
United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:29 am
United States. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:43 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
And in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 11:07 am
United States, which presents the question whether the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are binding when a district court imposes a new sentence pursuant to a revised guideline range under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:05 am
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 870, 875-876 (1989) and Peretz v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:33 pm
Trump, in which one of the intermediate appellate courts in NY held that a defamation case against a President of the United States can go forward in state court. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
" Section 1498(a) further provides that whenever a patented invention "is used or manufactured by or for the United States without license of the owner thereof . . . the owner's remedy shall be by action against the United States in the [CFC] for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use or manufacture. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court has already announced that it will review three state tax cases in its upcoming term — Comptroller v. [read post]
