Search for: "United States v. Childs" Results 461 - 480 of 8,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2022, 7:28 am by Russell Knight
If the child support is being withdrawn by the State Disbursement Unit (it almost always is), the child support will be terminated by the State Disbursement Unit according to the termination date in the underlying order. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:00 am by koherston
Parental rights are further protected by the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:00 am by koherston
Parental rights are further protected by the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:17 am by Family Law
From NCLR: The Supreme Court of the United States announced today that it will not review the decision in McLaughlin v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:09 pm by Kate Howard
United States 15-8975 Issue: When a child protection services investigator is a government agent for purposes of the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
Last week the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that a father taking 8 months to file an application under the Hague Convention for the return of his child to the United States does not constitute his consent to permitting the child to remain outside the Country with his mother.Diana Ibrahim, a native Ontario resident, and her husband, Imad Girgis, a native Jordanian resident, were residing in Florida under Girgis' work permit since 2001. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
" See United States v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am by Youth Justice Legal Centre
  Article 3(1) United Nation Convention on the Rights of the Child states that the best interests of the child are a primary consideration for all public bodies, including courts. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:23 pm by ilpc
On June 15th, The United States Supreme Court has issued an opinion in the highly anticipated Haaland v. [read post]
Smith, SCOTUS held that a state rule requiring a child’s birth certificate to list the non-biological father if he is married to the biological mother but that does not allow both same-sex spouses to be listed as parents is unconstitutional discrimination in violation of Obergefell v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:53 am by Daniel Clement
The United States Supreme Court ruled that an order prohibiting the removal of a child from a country without the non-custodial parent's consent is enforceable under an international child abduction treaty, In Abbott v. [read post]