Search for: "United States v. Cooper Corp"
Results 461 - 480
of 615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:00 am
Judge James V. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:40 am
H-09-0352 (United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Ltd.. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
(Sabbah v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
HT Window Fashions Corp (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Deliberate copying, litigation conduct warrant $10 million enhanced damages award [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:37 am
s approach is a model of cooperative federalism. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit) United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:53 pm
The court cited further authority in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Walgreens Corp. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Specialized Units Mr. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
