Search for: "United States v. Evers" Results 461 - 480 of 9,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2008, 6:45 am
The United States Supreme Court Justices will read a brief from one of the youngest lawyers ever to file before the high court. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am by Jeff Redding
  In particular, I have been thinking about it as a result of a gut feeling that the ‘2 v. 3’ debate is largely occurring within a vacuum, with not enough attention being paid to the current (beleaguered) state of the United States’ higher education system as a whole. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:31 pm
Well, now we know.)This opinion harkens back to the days of Chief Justice Traynor -- viewed by many as one of the greatest legal talents never to sit on the United States Supreme Court -- and is similarly scholarly, progressive, empirical, and informed. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court endorsed the unenumerated principle in the appropriately named case of United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:58 am
Thank goodness Clarence Gideon did not have to appear opposite you in 1963 and instead, he wrote a five page petition for writ of cert to the highest court in our land, the United States Supreme Court, which ultimately handed down the decision of Gideon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:30 am by Joel R. Brandes
Nothing in the record indicated that they had ever lived in—or even spent significant time in—the United States as of that date. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:41 am by ---------------------------------
In 1994, the Supreme Court of Ohio stated that in order to state such a claim, the plaintiff must be able to point to a clear public policy articulated in the Ohio or United States Constitutions, federal or state statutes, administrative rules and regulations, or the common law. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am by Steve Shiffrin
Wedding Cake Brief I filed a brief in the United States Supreme Court yesterday in the wedding cake case on behalf of Mike Dorf, Seana Shiffrin, and myself. [read post]