Search for: "United States v. Garcia"
Results 461 - 480
of 777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2009, 3:24 pm
Chase v The State In Chase v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 3:56 pm
Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
BANCO NACIONAL DE CRÉDITO, C.A., etc., Appellee. 3rd District.Civil procedure -- Sanctions -- Due process -- State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-7563, Garcia v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am
” At ACSblog, Ruben Garcia argues that in “Epic Systems … and … Encino Motor Cars v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:03 am
That decision is First Solar, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeGuidelines §3553(a) Factors, Justice Due Defendant, Community Cited in Re-Sentence to 30 Years in Prison United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 8:35 am
Garcia. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 11:58 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:49 am
Garcia v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm
Foltz v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 10:31 am
Garcia wrote that the “overwhelming” evidence suggested that SB 4 would “erode public trust and make communities less safe. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
Department of Justice filed an information, alleging that on five occasions between January 19, 2007 and July 5, 2007, [Mark Thomas Rossini] `intentionally and knowingly exceeded his authorized access to a protected computer belonging to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, an agency of the United States headquartered in the District of Columbia, and by such act obtained information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation that he was not permitted to receive,’ in… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Lee Holding Co., 471 F.3d 6, 11 (1st Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:44 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
Supreme Court holds that the federal courts have no authority to enforce the FLSA on non-federal governments under the 11th Amendment, which limits federal judicial power ["the judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State”].The development of the… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
Similar tendencies are at play in another immigration appeal, Garcia-Carbajal v. [read post]
