Search for: "United States v. General Instrument Corporation"
Results 461 - 480
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
As neither House of Parliament has raised an objection by 17 May 2024,[1] the way seems to be paved for the Government’s ambitious plans to have the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention[2] implemented and ratified by the end of June 2024.[3] For the first time since the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (so-called Brexit) on 31 January 2020, a general multilateral instrument would thus once again be put in place to govern the mutual recognition and… [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 37, 42 (1979). [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:33 am
The qui tam case is titled United States ex rel. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
Admissible or Admissibility: Any testimony, docu Âment or demonstrative material that is officially con Âsidered by the court by allowing it into evidence generally in compliance with the rules of evidence. [read post]
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Georgia Special Purpose Grand Juries But Were Afraid to Ask
17 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
” Though initially used to investigate organized crime, federal special grand juries have been empaneled for other complex inquiries: investigations into the collapse of the Enron Corporation and environmental wrongdoing at a nuclear facility in Rocky Flats, Colorado are two examples. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
It was Corzine's stated goal to transform MF Global from a commodity broker into an investment bank with a large proprietary trading operation similar to the one Corzine ran at Goldman in the 1990s. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:21 pm
The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth became a member of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America effective January 1, 1983. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:19 pm
As we all know by now, after the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:39 am
The more significant of those include:When lawyers were "examining and commenting upon a legal instrument, like a patent application, contract for a study, or the retention of experts," a wide range of lawyer comments, including those regarding "clarity, grammar, consistency, and organization" could be protected (id. at 21);Lawyers providing "grammatical, editorial, and word choice comments on non-legal type communications like scientific reports, articles, and… [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:51 am
The participants in instruments that led to that last crisis operated in a very opaque if not downright murky environment. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
Its attorneys—hired by TSI on a state-by-state basis--never do that. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
The rule prevents the funding from being used to directly or indirectly benefit countries “engaged in conduct that is detrimental to the national security or foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
Old generations die off. [read post]
