Search for: "United States v. General Instrument Corporation"
Results 461 - 480
of 593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein, the generous benefactors of this rotating chair, were instrumental in the creation of the SciFi network, but left it before it changed its spelling and got into wrestling matches and strange animal combinations like – I am not making this up – the Sharktopus. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The Status of Religious Arbitration in the United States and Canada Nicholas Walter Abstract: This paper discusses, and challenges, the status of religious arbitration in the United States and Canada. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:40 pm
See, e.g., Allied Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
A decision by the Court last year, clearing the way for unlimited spending by corporations in federal elections (Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
LGBTKF4754.5 .K59Gay and lesbian elders : history, law, and identity politics in the United States / Nancy J. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
SCOTT KAVALEK, et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 08-2646-NLH, United States District Court, D. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Snyder v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:35 am
Snyder v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs (IPKat) A touch of class: Latest news of IP TRANSLATOR (IPKat) Beware the ‘own name’ defense – AG opinion in Edwin Co (Property, intangible) General Court: likelihood of confusion for Oyster and Oystra (Class 46) OHIM Board of Appeal: nasty decision about the comparison of goods – no likelihood of confusion between MALONE and MALOTE (Class 46) Can a European… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
When an invention is conceived, it is generally presumed to be owned by the inventor under U.S. patent law. [1] The case of Stanford v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
When an invention is conceived, it is generally presumed to be owned by the inventor under U.S. patent law. [1] The case of Stanford v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Canada (Attorney General) 2011 FC 58 (Trade Mark Blog) (IPblog) Who must show consent in an intellectual property infringement case? [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
As was recently reported on this blog, in September the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit entered an important decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
In conclusion it is noted that the extent of publicity and public participation in a particular arbitration will depend on the instrument under which the claim is being brought. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted an all-time high 219,614 United States utility patents in 2010 – up 31 percent over 2009. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
Bribery Bill for Individuals and Corporations Already Subject to the FCPA. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
UK branches of firms whose home state is within the EEA are not required to apply the Code as their home state will be required to apply equivalent provisions under CRD3. [read post]
