Search for: "United States v. Gross" Results 461 - 480 of 1,808
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
I have finally finished reading the Mueller Report, slowly and with care. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 1:30 pm by John Floyd
The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 10:38 pm by Peter Mahler
The court also rejected the plaintiff’s assertion that the so-called “Kovel privilege” (United States v Kovel, 296 F2d 918 [2d Cir 1961]) attaches to the valuation report “because the purpose of the report was not to facilitate or clarify communications between plaintiff and his attorneys. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm by Carley Roberts and Mike Le
Of note, these decisions run parallel to developments at the federal level whereby the fate of judicial deference to federal agency interpretation of certain regulations is pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:49 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Baskin-Robbins Franchising is in the business of franchising independent businesses and people to operate Baskin-Robbins shops in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Haim Abraham
From 1812 through the mid-20th century, the state immunity doctrine was interpreted in accordance with the Supreme Court case Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]