Search for: "United States v. K"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,318
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2021, 1:20 pm
Here are the seven current members: Karen K. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:12 am
Uber Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:37 am
Anthony Fusco a/k/a Anthony John Fusco, Defendant (United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York, Adv. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm
Editor’s Note: These are the results of the seventh semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am
In the Douglass case, a ship owned by the defendant collided with a U.S. ship outside of the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm
Establish and reestablish regional, State, and local advisory committees for activities under his or her authority. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:12 am
(k). [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm
Through the cases highlighted in this series and others, it will leave an imprint on the future of regulatory law and policy in the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 11:22 am
Earlier this week, the United States Surgeon General, Dr. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
On June 21, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
On June 21, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:45 am
YouTube precedent holding that YouTube isn’t a state actor) rather than the comparatively unknown 11th Circuit. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
United States, 121 F. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
(Discussed with its conseqeunce for state liability with respect to the conduct of their SOEs HERE). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
‘Un Somaro Piumato’--Rethinking the Scope and Nature of State Liability for Acts of their Commercial Instrumentalities: State Owned Enterprises and State-Owner Liability in the Post-Global Larry Catá Backer[1] Abstract: Under what circumstances might a state be subject to liability for the conduct of its state owned enterprises (SOEs)? [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
John K. [read post]
