Search for: "United States v. March" Results 461 - 480 of 10,357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 10:45 am
Presumably also after your prison term therefor.For better or worse, you've now (again) illegally entered the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:10 am by Ross Dannenberg (Gamertag: Aviator)
Blockdot Inc. et al United States District Court, Eastern District of TexasCase No. 2-07CV-263, Filed June 20, 2007 Case Update: This case was well on its way to jury trial, but was dismissed on March 25, 2011, following a settlement by the parties. [read post]
16 May 2009, 3:51 am
EEO/iNews from the United States Supreme Court - Thursday, May 14, 2009Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:38 am by Ryan McCabe
    The United States District Court of Nebraska entered a consent order on March 3, 2010 in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:40 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America 13-449Issue: (1) Whether the First Amendment permits civil courts to retroactively impose a “trust” on church property based on church canons that were never embodied in any secular instrument of property ownership and did not comply with state law at the time of their adoption; (2) whether the Contracts Clause permits civil courts resolving church property disputes to apply changes to… [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:35 pm
United States Docketed: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Case Nos.: (05-0500/NA) ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dec 22 2006 Application (06A795) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 9, 2007 to March 10, 2007, submitted to The Chief Justice. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 6:59 am by Alyson Drake
The Women’s History Month March Madness contest enters the Semifinals this morning, with a match-up between Ruth Bader Ginsburg v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am by Jane Chong
This week, a federal court in Oregon rebuffed him; the following post summarizes the most recent developments in United States v. [read post]