Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 461 - 480
of 9,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
As per the conceptual comparison, the Court endorsed the Board of Appeal’s findings that the word ‘elma’ is an unusual female first name and is also the name of four small towns in the United States [which, for what it’s worth, a Greek consumer would have never thought], and that the word ‘elmex’ is devoid of any meaning. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
According to the United States National Restaurant Association, there are more than 1,000,000 restaurants in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
”) State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:29 am
UDRP is not centric to any particular national law, but where the parties are “domiciled in the United States and United States courts have recent experience with similar disputes … the Sole Panelist shall look to rules and principles of law set out in decisions of the courts of the United States,” EAuto, L.L.C. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:48 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
The new false marking statute will limit lawsuits to being filed only by the government or those that can show a competitive injury from the false marking: (1) IN GENERAL- Section 292 of title 35, United States Code, is amended– (A) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: ‘Only the United States may sue for the penalty authorized by this subsection. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 2:26 am
Here, none of the documents provided by applicant was dated prior to its filing date, and none related to its intention to use the SWISS GRILLS mark in the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
Case date: 30 April 2021 Case number: No. 19-1349 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 8:00 am
Case date: 19 December 2024 Case number: No. 23-1176-cv Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 8:33 pm
Mark Anderson of The Wall Street Journal reports today that the United Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal of a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in a class action by Enron investors against numerous Wall Street firms, "striking a fatal blow against the class-action investor lawsuit. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:21 am
Bennett has argued and briefed scores of cases before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Hawaii Supreme Court, and has twice successfully argued before the Supreme Court of the United States in Hawaii v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:27 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), a U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
United States, 208 U.S. 161 (1908)(striking down ban on "yellow-dog" contracts that forbade workers from joining trade unions.)Muller v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 6:19 am
An Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals panel upheld a preliminary injunction barring the use of the “KRANK3D” mark, in a case brought by a company that holds the registered trademark “KRANK’D” (Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:05 am
Dureska [3/4/22] Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States denied review in Savannah College of Art and Design v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Miss United States of America LLC, DBA United States of America Pageants v.Abundance Productions, LLC, Cancellation No. 92071814 (March 8, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
A miscellaneous statement in the application indicated ed that "[t]he 'XXXX' in the mark denotes the unabbreviated name of a state of the United States and Puerto Rico. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 8:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has finally held that the mark is generic and not entitled to registration. [read post]
