Search for: "United States v. Mitchell" Results 461 - 480 of 907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
The Colorado state trial court held that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 am by Mac
The United States was bitterly divided over the war and the draft. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Today’s live blog team comprises Emma Boffey, Rory Thomson, Shona McCusker, Sian McNiff, Kenneth Rose, Emma Cross, Will Anderson, Mitchell Abbott, Felicity Bramall and Jennifer Love, all from CMS. 16:01: Lady Hale thanks the parties for the swiftness of their submissions and notes that the Court will adjourn until 10.30am tomorrow. 16:00: Lord Keen QC rests his submissions. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/19/08-99005.pdf United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Supreme Court on March 19 refused to hear a case involving a challenge to a DNA sample taken from a Pennsylvania man (Mitchell v. [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish standing, an organizational plaintiff . . . must show that at least one of its members would have standing to sue, that it is representative of the organizational purposes it asserts and that the case would not require the participation of individual members" (New York State Assn. of Nurse Anesthetists v Novello, 2 NY3d 207, 211). [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish standing, an organizational plaintiff . . . must show that at least one of its members would have standing to sue, that it is representative of the organizational purposes it asserts and that the case would not require the participation of individual members" (New York State Assn. of Nurse Anesthetists v Novello, 2 NY3d 207, 211). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
’ Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 526, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (emphasis in original). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:36 pm by Jeralyn
Additionally, in developing this proposed regulation, the CDCR was guided by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Baze v. [read post]