Search for: "United States v. Obey" Results 461 - 480 of 613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am by Richard Hunt
Based on this assumption the Court finds that a single family unit is not properly comparable to the unit make up of unrelated disabled residents of a group home. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 7:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the District Court, the case is titled only “Sealed v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court used the words “obligation” and “debt” interchangeably. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  For instance, he might set a criminal free for a reason which has nothing to do with the reliability of the evidence or the justice of the case.Orin Kerr at VC has this post on United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
When the M/V Galani hit the M/V Marina in the Paros-Antiparos Strait, a woman named Curtis with wounds most injurious brought suit in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
” In so doing, Roosevelt justified his actions “by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States[.] [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999) (joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor and Thomas) gives a bit of the background:Despite the text [of the Fifth Amendment], we held in Griffin v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:33 am
Khadr and passed the fruits of the interviews on to U.S. officials has been found by the United States Supreme Court to violate U.S. domestic law and international human rights obligations to which Canada is party. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:02 am by Jack Goldsmith
” As the Supreme Court stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States) "the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
” Peters responded by demanding that the Americans “obey the law. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:10 am by INFORRM
The rationale for such strict contempt laws is that they compensate for the fact that in Britain, unlike the United States, we have very limited jury vetting and so prejudicial material must be especially carefully controlled before and during the trial. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
  This Court has recognized that Section 5′s intrusion on state sovereignty raises serious constitutional questions” (citing the 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]