Search for: "United States v. Security State Bank"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Typically, a United States depository bank has custody of the security corresponding to an ADR and issues the ADR certificate to a United States investor. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
FINRA became the largest independent regulator for all securities firms doing business in the United States, and is responsible for overseeing brokerage firms, their branch offices and registered securities representatives.Under the Securities Exchange Commission’s authority FINRA promulgates rules of its own as a self regulatory organization (“SRO”). [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:08 pm
Timm, both United States Supreme Court cases. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 7:21 am
There was no allegation that any of the negotiations or meetings regarding this scheme occurred within the United States, that the payment of bribes occurred through banks located in the United States, or that the foreign defendants otherwise ever traveled to the United States in furtherance of the bribery scheme. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK: EFFECTS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES With the decision in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:53 am
Securities and Exch. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 11:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:04 am
In Baker v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:57 am
Nat’l Australia Bank, the United States Supreme Court held that U.S. securities laws do not apply extraterritorially. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
United States, in which the Court held that tribes lack civil jurisdiction over non-members and their fee land, but also carved out two exceptions: one, that a tribe may regulate the "activities of nonmembers who enter consensual relationships with the tribe or its members"; and, two, that when the conduct of non-Indians within the reservation threatens "the political integrity, the economic security, or the health and welfare of the tribe," the tribe… [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:53 am
United States, the high court confirmed that for purposes of calculating restitution, the return to the lender of collateral securing a fraudulent loan is not completed until the victim lender receives money from the sale of the collateral. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
The transactions at issue in this case were not subject to Rule 105 because while the short sales took place on the NYSE, the activities related to the subsequent purchase of the same securities in an offering occurred entirely outside of the United States (SEC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
§ 1782 for issuance of document and deposition subpoenas to three non-parties in the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am
Thousands of Whistleblowers At-Risk of Losing Protection WASHINGTON, DC – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, November 28, 2017 — The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in a major precedent setting whistleblower case, Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:26 pm
On June 13, 2011, the Supreme Court for the State of New York, Appellate Division, issued an opinion in the case of Bank of New York v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:15 pm
Bank Ltd. three Australian investors (“Plaintiffs”) sued National Australia Bank, and its wholly owned United States based subsidiary, HomeSide, alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:37 am
” For example, in Bank Julius Baer & Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
