Search for: "United States v. Taylor" Results 461 - 480 of 1,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
Writing on Lawfare, both Robert Chesney and Margaret Taylor have taken a look at the legal authority under which Trump might, as he has threatened, build a wall pursuant to a declared state of emergency. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:36 am by Scott Harman
Matthew Kahn shared the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
United States, and welcomed feedback on those chapters. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:24 pm by Anthony O'Rourke
Last week, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Taylor Law requires all public employers and employee organizations to negotiate in good faith to determine the terms and conditions of employment of employees in the negotiating unit. 2. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Taylor Law requires all public employers and employee organizations to negotiate in good faith to determine the terms and conditions of employment of employees in the negotiating unit. 2. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:45 am
Nelson (University of Houston), and Roberto Tallarita (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Of note, the Alberta Court relied on legal developments in the United States in its decision. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]