Search for: "United States v. Windsor" Results 461 - 480 of 1,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2022, 5:43 am by William S. Dodge
Windsor (excerpted in the 1978 Digest of U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 10:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state’s planned plea to the Supreme Court would be the first time the issue of same-sex marriage had returned to the Justices since their rulings in late June — one of which, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
After the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
While the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:45 am by Christopher Collins
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on June 27, 2014, the DOL proposed the revision in light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
The same provision of DOMA, of course, was later ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Perry; the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:25 am by Amy Howe
”  In the Boston Review, Pam Karlan explains why the Court’s recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Ainsworth, Amicus Curiae Brief: Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:48 am
Anyway, the 9th Circuit panel determined that the Supreme Court's DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:20 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Parti Québécois to unveil secular charter Tuesday Testing the climate for worker-choice laws Editorial: Good move on legal expense insurance United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Starger, A Visual Guide to United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 Attorney General Schuette is correct to seek en banc review rather than intermediate appellate review from a 3-judge panel; why waste the time and resources.There is no doubt that this case, along with select others from across the nation, will be ultimately decided by the SCOTUS, as in the United States v Windsor. [read post]