Search for: "Utter v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The monograph ran with the basic idea that our nation, the United States, has a “civil religion” organized around the Constitution, and that this is a faith to which we must all choose to subscribe. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Williams Issue: Do decisions holding that the direction of a verdict of acquittal by a trial judge, taking the case from the jury, based on an erroneous understanding of that which constitutes the elements of the offense, constitutes an acquittal barring retrial, conflict with United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
” The United States Supreme Court has instructed that: [p]roperly applied, the test requires a court to make its own inquiry into the imminence and magnitude of the danger said to flow from the particular utterance and then to balance the character of the evil, as well as its likelihood, against the need for free and unfettered expression. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm by Kevin
United States today, according to the Associated Press. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/37753-5.10.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
Bush appointee to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:36 am by David Post
” Here’s the text of the Sedition Act, which is worth reading if you’ve not read it before: And be it further enacted, That if any person shall write, print, utter, or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States,… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm by Bexis
  We’ve received the same bone-headed response from an appellate court in a branded case, seeWimbush v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  Patricia’s daughter continues in her declaration to state what anyone would have to agree is the obvious. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
Germany, the U.K., and the United States notably belong to the latter camp. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm by INFORRM
On 8 June 2010 in El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co v United States the Federal Appeals Court for the District of Columbia upheld the dismissal of a defamation suit for statements that Clinton administration officials reportedly made to the press to justify the missile attack against a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan in 1998. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 12:11 pm by Lee E. Berlik
The court indicated it would enter such an order, permanently restraining and enjoining Christopher from publishing the statements found to be defamatory to recipients within the United States by mail, email, or other social media. [read post]