Search for: "W. Branch"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
The Executive branch says they do; the House says they don’t. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm
Two branches of the federal government have now weighed in in favor of the cisgender girls claiming the policy discriminates against them. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 8:21 am
The massive Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative, started late in the George W. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:17 am
. ●Call for Applications: In partnership with the Andrew W. [read post]
27 May 2020, 7:00 am
An L-1 visa would be valid for no more than 12 months if a U.S. branch or affiliate does not already exist. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:20 am
W. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am
For the branch offices or any other permanent establishments created by Google Ireland in France, it could claim “permanent establishment discrimination” under Article 22 (4)[14] of the Treaty. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
This isn’t the first conflict between Congress and a president, she stressed, but the Supreme Court has never had to weigh in on this issue because the two branches have always worked it out before. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Nina Totenberg reports for NPR that “[h]ow the court decides these cases could dramatically change the balance of power among the three branches of government, thus shifting the American system of checks and balances. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:56 am
” Yet the latter opinion also describes various ways in which the executive branch has interpreted the act narrowly. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
[Further thoughts on the Tucker Act and Federal Question Jurisdiction] Last week I posed a question: "can a plaintiff seek compensation for an unconstitutional taking, without relying on the Tucker Act's jurisdiction–if not under the Takings Clause, perhaps under some theory of tort. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:18 am
(From Ontological Modeling of Geographical Relationships for Map Generalization)In The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society 1250-1600 (Cambridge University Press, 1997), Alfred W. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:36 pm
That’s W-I-G-G-A-M-G-E-E-R dot com. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm
Visita nuestro Observatorio COVID-19 en Puerto Rico Por el Lcdo. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 12:23 pm
Attorney Sonia W. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:38 am
President George W. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:25 pm
Specifically, the majority ruled that the shutdown does not qualify as a taking because it is an exercise of the "police power" and because it is only a temporary restriction on the owners' use of property, which therefore does not destroy all of its economic value: [W]e conclude that Petitioners have not established that a regulatory taking has occurred. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
But at one point one of them said something along the lines of “[w]e are aware that the current draft of the statute is very broad, and seems to apply to many activities that would not be considered as spam by most people. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 1:34 pm
Dionne, W. [read post]
