Search for: "W. E. Davis"
Results 461 - 480
of 676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm
Davis, University of Toledo College of LawRochelle Davis, School of Foreign Service, Georgetown UniversityWolfgang Deckers, Richmond University, LondonMichelle M. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
W. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
*This is the fifteenth post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM) United States US General Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inventive Step)… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:50 am
(W. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:16 am
• Charles W. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 5:13 am
"We actually have probation officers riding with us," Precinct 7 Deputy Johnathon Davis told CNN affiliate KPRC. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:29 pm
W. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Gerry W. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
Knauer, Temple University, James E. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
Davis, for Defendant-Appellant.Dustin C. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
W. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
A trial court's decision "[w]hether to award attorney fees . . . pursuant to OCGA § 19 6 2 is a matter within the discretion of the trial court, and the exercise of that discretion will not be reversed unless manifestly or flagrantly abused. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:02 am
10-15-00037-CV Jess W. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
W. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:41 am
• Dan W. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:41 am
• Dan W. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
