Search for: "WATKINS V. STATE" Results 461 - 480 of 544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
 The Fourth Circuit's decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:22 pm by Legal Talk Network
Heiden, partner in the Chicago office of Latham & Watkins, to dissect Connecticut v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:39 am
Heiden, partner in the Chicago office of Latham & Watkins, to dissect Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
And the result isn't surprising after the SCOTUS opinion in District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:31 pm
A white collar defendant's good deeds are put under the microscope in Judge Marrero's thoughtful decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:19 pm
" Yesterday's FinCri Advisor featured a jeremiad in which some experts warned that the Cuomo v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 1:09 pm
Bell of Latham & Watkins in Washington — argued that Iqbal did not change the law, and did not aler the Twombly rule on plausibility requirements. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Ed. at 1045-47 (holding state could not criminalize teaching of German language to pupils who had not yet passed eighth grade); Watkins v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
"Sealing of Sentencing Documents Relating to Defendant's CooperationIn United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
" The material presented includes the following [The General Index of Topics and samples from the text are set out below for your review]: General Index of Topics Table of Cases IntroductionAn outline of issues and concerns relevant toSituations involving Sections 207-a and 207-c of theGeneral Municipal LawGeneral Outline Of Cases And Related MaterialsConcerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a,Section 207-c and related lawsThe Full Text of Selected Opinions Selected provisions of law:… [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
May 15, 2009)(per curiam) (condemnation, uncompensable losses, lost revenue testimony should not have been admitted)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]