Search for: "Ward v. United States" Results 461 - 480 of 699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Florida: a former superintendent has had his lawsuit against the accounting firm Mauldin & Jenkins dismissed. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:19 am by Gregory Forman
 Some of the impetus for this trend was the United States Supreme Court decision in Gomez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal., 508 U.S. 602, 617 (1993) (“due process requires a ‘neutral and detached judge in the first instance’ ” (quoting Ward v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:02 pm
West, Losers: Recovering Lost Property in Japan and the United States, 37 Law & Soc. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 10:14 am
I just finished Julie Powell, Julie and Julia: My Year of Cooking Dangerously (thanks, Jocelyn) and have bookmarks somewhere in Bill Bryson, Made in America: An Informal History of the English Language in the United States, Charles J. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:14 am
Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 271 (1970) (termination of welfare benefits). 2 Tumey v.Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 532 (1927) (judge may not have a personal interest in costs assessed against convicted defendants); Ward v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm
It is impossible not to note that leverage is an easy concept to sling around where it is a Dutch company and a Dutch governmental unit projecting international standards downward into Bangladesh. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:45 am by Steve Hall
AEDPA precludes federal habeas relief when a state court has adjudicated a federal claim on its merits, unless the state court ruling was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
  From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Lee, University of Pennsylvania  Fair Employment and the Making of a Segregationist Movement, Jason Morgan Ward, Mississippi State University  Devil’s Bargain: The FEPC and the Paradox of Rights in the Welfare State, James T. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]