Search for: "Warren v. Federal Government" Results 461 - 480 of 787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am by Eric Baxter
Smith did modify – without overruling – the Warren Court’s Sherbert v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
Earl Warren's court, the Warren court, was thought to be this wild -- by its opponents, this wildly liberal, usually big-government-oriented court that was doing everything it could to legislate from the bench and extend the realm of the federal government. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
JEFFREY BROWN: This tug-of-war between the branches of government isn't new. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:19 am by Stephen Wermiel
This thoroughly unregulated field is in marked contrast to the papers of presidents, which are governed by federal law. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Bush (2004) -- held that federal courts have jurisdiction to consider legal appeals filed on behalf of foreign citizens held by the U.S. military at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba.Kelo v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Ayo Aladesanmi
The restructuring within the agency comes on the heels of West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Ronald Collins
Today, some see liberty as protection against private oppression through government regulation. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am by Stephen Wermiel
 In the past sixty years, since the start of the Warren Court in 1953, the Justices have struck down all or parts of federal laws more than one hundred times. [read post]
29 May 2010, 1:12 pm by Keith Rizzardi
  Even some small degree of advance planning, had it been required by the ESA, could have enabled much faster decision-making and response times for BP, the Federal Government, and for the endangered and threatened species in the Gulf. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
At other times, it has protected in rejecting government overreach as in cases such as Katz v. [read post]