Search for: "Washington v. Government of District of Columbia"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
Government. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
Government. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am
Thousands of Whistleblowers At-Risk of Losing Protection WASHINGTON, DC – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, November 28, 2017 — The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in a major precedent setting whistleblower case, Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be view here IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street, NW,… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be viewed here IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street, NW,… [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am
District of Columbia, which involves the effect of a tolling provision in the federal supplemental-jurisdiction statute on litigants who want to pursue state-court claims after related federal claims have been dismissed. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in favor of a pregnant undocumented teen seeking an abortion, and to discipline the American Civil Liberties Union attorneys representing the teen for allegedly misleading the government into delaying a request for a stay of the ruling until after the abortion had been performed. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
By that I meant that, like all constitutional provisions, the Second Amendment lies in the background as an outer limit on what can be done, just as (for example) the Fifth and Sixteenth amendments place limits on the “takings” and taxation powers, respectively.Just as a safety requirement for a consumer good is generally not a taking and a decision to raise the top marginal income tax rate does not violate the Sixteenth Amendment, even the most aggressive gun control efforts that are… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 7:35 am
Artis v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
In FTC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
” At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the recent oral arguments in probable-cause and qualified-immunity case District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:43 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the legal remedy of habeas corpus has been of little benefit for Guantanamo prisoners. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am
A federal judge issued the warrant, which was served on Microsoft at its headquarters in Washington state. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am
In Brady v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
Still pending in the District Court for the District of Columbia is Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
The first was in probable-cause and qualified-immunity case District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am
The amended complaint added two parties: Restaurant Opportunities Centers United (ROC), an organization with members who are restaurant employees, and Jill Phaneuf, who “seeks to book embassy functions” and other events involving foreign governments in the District of Columbia. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 10:12 am
Perry, from 1974, and Menna v. [read post]
