Search for: "Washington v. U. S" Results 461 - 480 of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2007, 2:00 pm
Stone discusses Chief Justice Roberts's view that Supreme Court cases should be decided on narrow grounds (Professor Stone also posted a very similar piece on the U. of Chicago Faculty Law Blog here which does not require registration). [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:27 am
C a text inviting her to travel with him to Washington, D.C. on business. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:09 pm by Michelle Yeary
  Unfortunately, earlier this month, the Washington Supreme Court zigged where California zagged and Macias v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm by Lyle Denniston
The chief judge of the federal District Court in Washington has assigned himself the task of sorting out the rights of detainees at Guantanamo Bay to meet with their lawyers. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
The 1993 law that has barred gays and lesbians from serving openly in the nation’s military services will be repealed effective Sept. 20, the Obama Administration said in papers filed Friday afternoon with the Ninth Circuit Court in San Francisco and released in Washington. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
Background: The Breach of Target’s Security Target is based in Minneapolis and has almost 1,800 stores in the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
These products may have been sold at the following retailers, including, but not limited to: HEB, Kroger, Safeway, Sprouts Farmers Market, Trader Joe’s, Walmart, Weis Markets, and WinCo Foods. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:36 am by John Coyle
Supreme Court’s decision in International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 12:48 pm
Duffy, in Rethinking the Prospect Theory of Patents, 71 U. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:21 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
In addition, APPA recommended in our comments an administrative mechanism for providing additional compliance time using the Title V permitting program that we believe is within U. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
Monday’s order list was a striking illustration of how nice it is to have Washington on your side: Of the four relisted cases the Supreme Court agreed to review, the government (either as amicus or respondent) had told the court that review was warranted in three of them. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:18 am by Douglas Reiser
The BIAW filed a lawsuit in May of this year, alleging that Washingtons new Energy Code was preempted by the federal EPCA (Energy Policy and Conservation Act). [read post]