Search for: "Watkins v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
Watkins v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
Watkins v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:58 am
Smith of Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
”John Thorpe MP put the State firmly ahead of the individual:“… In my view the State is in great danger, and no power which would tend to protect it should be withheld from the Government. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
That was the focus of the 2nd District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
FEC, Disclosure, Political spending, State law, Taxation SEC Bulletin on Conflicts of Interest for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Posted by W. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
” CTS Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm
That’s what the case of Fisher v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:43 pm
We might see Maples v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am
Lobrano, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, January 28, 2017 Tags: Bankruptcy, Bondholders, Debt, Debtor-creditor law, Distressed companies, Foreclosures, Restructurings, Securities regulation, Trust Indenture Act, U.S. federal courts The Spotlight on Boards 2017 Posted by Martin Lipton and Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
On August 15, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided EEOC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
On August 15, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided EEOC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:54 pm
Keith Watkins in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:54 pm
Garre of the Washington office of Latham & Watkins will argue for the state of Florida in both cases – Florida v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 11:59 am
§ 1752) that are not included in the United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:37 am
Rose, Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC The financial meltdown injected urgency to the debate about the roles of federal and state law in corporate governance. [read post]
