Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 461 - 480
of 6,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 3:32 am
Sure, there's always a plea for the parsimony clause, but don't bet your life on it.So is it just us, or do judges think the guidelines are incomprehensible as well? [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:17 pm
The first rule of Judging is don't let the inmates run the asylum, and by "inmates" our robed readers clearly mean trial lawyers. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
But if they don't, they can file a lawsuit and make you prove your right to fair use. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
If at first you don't succeed, file, file again. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:14 pm
But officers don't like us to know the truth. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 11:06 pm
They use the language of burdens of proof, but the truth is that it's just a gut feeling, like anyone else's gut feeling, colored by the legalese required of the robe.But judges don't make credibility findings, juries do? [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:51 am
We’ve had a lot of cases recently where we’ve granted relief because here’s somebody arrested for possession of cocaine or meth or whatever and they plead guilty because they’ve got a job or a family or they just can’t stay in jail for the next six months before trial; they don’t have enough money to make bail, but they plead guilty. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
And don't even get us started on civil court. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:54 am
Is there a way to defend her? [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 12:12 am
We don't need isolated and eye-wash changes and we need complete change. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:03 pm
Judge Owens artfully puts it this way, the first sentence of which (especially the parenthetical) brought a smile to my face:"[Defendant] was hardly the Don Corleone (or even the Fredo) of this enterprise. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:21 am
But the screeners don't stop defendants from getting in it, so that doesn't really help much. [read post]
Private Censorship Is Not the Best Way to Fight Hate or Defend Democracy: Here Are Some Better Ideas
30 Jan 2018, 9:51 am
Or they’re things some users want to read and others don’t. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
The defendant's lawyer challenged (on rehearing) the fact that the panel had two visiting district judges. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 5:07 pm
His chambers was wired and he appeared headed for a downfall until (we can't make this stuff up) Davis was defended by one Alcee Hastings- himself an impeached federal judge before being elected to congress (only in Miami does this crap happen, right?). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Lower court judges don't have license to adopt a cramped reading of a case in order to functionally overrule it. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:29 am
"I had no idea, but that sounds right because I sure don't remember putting some of that stuff there. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:38 am
I don't understand. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:09 am
Ernie Allen, president and chief executive of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, said some judges don't realize possessing the images revictimizes the children in the photographs and fuels a growing online business. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Experts don't have percipient, first-hand knowledge of the facts. [read post]
