Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 461 - 480
of 6,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
If at first you don't succeed, file, file again. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:14 pm
But officers don't like us to know the truth. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:03 pm
Judge Owens artfully puts it this way, the first sentence of which (especially the parenthetical) brought a smile to my face:"[Defendant] was hardly the Don Corleone (or even the Fredo) of this enterprise. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 1:05 pm
You don't think the judge is ever going to catch on? [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
And don't even get us started on civil court. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
Under our scheme, we don't admit that the process developed over centuries with the incremental approval of judge after judge is flawed. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:32 am
Sure, there's always a plea for the parsimony clause, but don't bet your life on it.So is it just us, or do judges think the guidelines are incomprehensible as well? [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
But if they don't, they can file a lawsuit and make you prove your right to fair use. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:54 am
Is there a way to defend her? [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 3:28 pm
House Judiciary Committee Democrats say they analyzed the telecom spying documents they've sought for more than a year and have come to the conclusion the phone and internet companies don't deserve retroactive amnesty for charges they spied illegally on Americans. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 5:07 pm
His chambers was wired and he appeared headed for a downfall until (we can't make this stuff up) Davis was defended by one Alcee Hastings- himself an impeached federal judge before being elected to congress (only in Miami does this crap happen, right?). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:28 am
But these background facts don't give the judge the same human knowledge about the person that a face-to-face interaction does. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 11:06 pm
They use the language of burdens of proof, but the truth is that it's just a gut feeling, like anyone else's gut feeling, colored by the legalese required of the robe.But judges don't make credibility findings, juries do? [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
The defendant's lawyer challenged (on rehearing) the fact that the panel had two visiting district judges. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:17 am
We don't do such things because we are not animals. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:09 am
Ernie Allen, president and chief executive of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, said some judges don't realize possessing the images revictimizes the children in the photographs and fuels a growing online business. [read post]
Private Censorship Is Not the Best Way to Fight Hate or Defend Democracy: Here Are Some Better Ideas
30 Jan 2018, 9:51 am
Or they’re things some users want to read and others don’t. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:38 am
I don't understand. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:21 am
But the screeners don't stop defendants from getting in it, so that doesn't really help much. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:43 am
Indeed, I'm one of them, and I don't take such cases because of it.But then, this isn't something that you figure out in the middle of trial. [read post]