Search for: "Westchester County v. County of Westchester" Results 461 - 480 of 1,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2009, 3:23 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222.* The disciplinary charges filed against Ward alleged that he failed to follow the guidelines relating to the treatment of confidential informants; that he failed to report matters of a police nature to his immediate supervisor; and that he engaged in conduct that brought discredit upon the Department.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 11:47 pm
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222.* The disciplinary charges filed against Ward alleged that he failed to follow the guidelines relating to the treatment of confidential informants; that he failed to report matters of a police nature to his immediate supervisor; and that he engaged in conduct that brought discredit upon the Department. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:00 pm
The Westchester County Supreme Court felt otherwise and dismissed the case. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 5:36 am by Jeremy Saland
The New York criminal lawyers and former Manhattan prosecutors at Crotty Saland PC represent clients in New York City, Westchester County, Putnam County, Duchess County, Rockland County and other suburban municipalities. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 5:36 am by Jeremy Saland
The New York criminal lawyers and former Manhattan prosecutors at Crotty Saland PC represent clients in New York City, Westchester County, Putnam County, Duchess County, Rockland County and other suburban municipalities. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:15 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, the court ruled that under the circumstances terminating Halpin did not constitute an "excessive penalty. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On September 29, 2008, the plaintiffs pro se filed a summons with notice at the Westchester County Clerk commencing an action against, among others, Heilman, Carloni, and Freedman, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On September 29, 2008, the plaintiffs pro se filed a summons with notice at the Westchester County Clerk commencing an action against, among others, Heilman, Carloni, and Freedman, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]