Search for: "White v. Does 1-21" Results 461 - 480 of 900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
See 1 App. in No. 21–707, at 402 (“[N]o one has directed anybody to achieve a critical mass, and I’m not even sure we would know what it is. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 9:26 am by Katherine Pompilio
Authorities report 21 Ukrainian casualties and 112 injuries in the past 24 hours. [read post]
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm by Michael Lowe
  Common street names include: Blue Silk, Cloud Nine, Drone,  Energy-1, Ivory Wave, Lunar Wave, Meow Meow, Ocean Burst, Pure Ivory, Purple Wave, Red Dove, Snow Leopard, Stardust, Vanilla Sky, White Dove, White Knight, and White Lightening. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Rodriguez,” 21 La Raza L.J. (2011): The Rodriguez claimants were low-income children and families of color whose school district was dramatically unequal in every respect when compared to the local, wealthy, white school district at issue in the case. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
This is the last full week of the Michaelmas legal term which ends on Monday 21 December 2020. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Aviles-Colon, No. 05-1384, 05-2039, 05-2040 Conviction for conspiracy to distribute heroin, cocaine, and marijuana at three drug points in Puerto Rico in violation of 21 U.S.C. sections 841(a) and 846 and for possession of firearms, is affirmed for two appellants and vacated for the third appellant where: 1) with respect to the two appellants there is no reversible error; and 2) with respect to the third appellant, the government failed to disclose exculpatory evidence material to… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:37 am by Susan Brenner
Code § 13032(b)(1) [now codified in 18 U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm by Phil Dixon
The elements of the claim are: “(1) the defendant seized the plaintiff pursuant to legal process not supported by probable cause, and (2) the criminal proceedings terminated in the plaintiff’s favor. [read post]