Search for: "William Marshall v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Wisconsin, 13-8743; Marshall v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The many dissents of Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall (later joined by Justice Harry Blackmun) in death penalty cases, in which they argued that the imposition of a criminal penalty of death violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against the cruel and unusual punishments, has not (at least not yet) translated into a majority opinion or even into mainstream public opinion. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am by Jeffery Robinson
 An objective, fact-based evaluation of America’s history regarding home ownership, education, the use of the criminal legal system, and other critical areas of American life will reveal a government-supported philosophy that is best described by Thurgood Marshall in his Supreme Court argument in Brown v. the Board. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 2:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
Breyer also cited another 1972 in-chambers opinion, by Justice William O. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm by kwalters
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am by Jay Willis
United States and Padilla v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Gaughan
Supreme Court, a fraction of the time of major justices such as John Marshall (34 years), Stephen Field (34 years), Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (29 years), Hugo Black (34 years), William Brennan (34 years), and Antonin Scalia (30 years). [read post]