Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 461 - 480 of 6,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
There are currently two referrals on SPC law pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), both of which concern the interpretation of Article 3(c) of the SPC Regulation (EC) 469/2009. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:49 pm by Howard Knopf
I wrote here  in 2009 about how former and then sitting Board Chair Justice William Vancise expressed his frank views. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Relatedly, some members of today’s Court who have great respect for Chief Justice William Rehnquist (the author of a very relevant concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  For most of Justice Black’s career as a Justice, the Supreme Court was dominated by liberals and progressives, including Chief Justice Earl Warren and Associate Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 5:11 pm by Derek Muller
Harper today, one could be forgiven to forget that Chief Justice William Rehnquist passed away nearly two decades ago and is not currently sitting on the court. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm by Amy Howe
Instead, Kavanaugh appeared receptive to a version of the theory, outlined by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in a concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
But the theory made an appearance in a concurring opinion by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm by Mark Walsh
(William Hennessy) Justice Samuel Alito asks Olson about “some hypotheticals in a brief submitted by Josh Blackman. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
On 1 December 2022, the Court of Appeal (Lewis, Elisabeth Laing and Warby LJJ) heard an appeal in the case of Millicom Service UK Limited & Ors v Clifford. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:43 am by Guest Author
King also presents peculiar politics: it’s the only instance where left-leaning Justices applied the MQD over a dissent from the Court’s “conservative” block. [read post]