Search for: "class Plaintiffs" Results 461 - 480 of 34,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2011, 10:16 am by Luke Green
: An Empirical Analysis of Lead Plaintiffs in Securities Class Actions, 100 Columbia Law Review 101-155(2006), and There Are Plaintiffs and ... [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:00 am by David Wright
This option—if allowed by the Supreme Court—works only for plaintiffs in class action cases, not defendants. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 10:26 am by David Wright
We have commented before in this space about using offers of judgment to “pick off” the named plaintiff in a class action case, a tactic the Supreme Court addressed in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 3:00 am by Ann Lipton
Theranos is based in California; presumably, the plaintiffs intend to argue that any false statements emanated from... [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:03 am
., who charged that he conspired to pay kickbacks to people who agreed to be plaintiffs in class-action cases. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 5:47 pm
There, some class members had earlier entered into a "Stipulation of Dismissal of Certain Plaintiffs' Claims Without Prejudice. [read post]
  Thus, Miller’s position would allow plaintiffs to bring class actions (“and therefore give potential intervenors a right to assert the reliance interests of class members”) without including any class allegations in their complaints. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:53 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
The plaintiffs argue that if only equitable relief is sought, a class action suit may be maintained under Rule 23(b)(2) even if the equitable relief is mainly monetary. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Insurance companies often view class actions as meritless suits driven by plaintiffs’ lawyers and perhaps one or two disgruntled insureds. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by Patrick T. Ryan
In Campbell-Ewald, the Supreme Court ruled that a named plaintiff’s proposed class action is not rendered moot when the defendant makes a settlement offer or a Rule 68 offer of judgment that would satisfy the plaintiff’s individual claim but the plaintiff refuses to accept the offer. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by Patrick T. Ryan
In Campbell-Ewald, the Supreme Court ruled that a named plaintiff’s proposed class action is not rendered moot when the defendant makes a settlement offer or a Rule 68 offer of judgment that would satisfy the plaintiff’s individual claim but the plaintiff refuses to accept the offer. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:43 am by Gary M. Pappas
The Eleventh Circuit reversed an interlocutory order certifying an injunction class, rejecting the plaintiffs’ ploy “to lop off all the damages-based warts and recast their claim as one for injunctive relief under Rule 23(b)(2)” after their attempt to certify a damages class was denied. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:58 am by Pete Strom
Companies Use Arbitration Clauses to Prevent Class Action Lawsuits, Hurting Consumers Class action lawsuits are large, consolidated cases involving plaintiffs who have been hurt by irresponsible business practices or defective products created by a large company. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
”   But the court ruled that the experiences of the named Plaintiffs “diverge significantly” from the proposed class members, and at most were typical of only some of the proposed class members. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 6:14 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
July 20, 2018), Plaintiff – a well-known class action plaintiffs’ law firm – alleged that Defendants regularly filed frivolous objections to class action settlements in order to leverage lucrative payoffs, and that as class action attorneys, they were forced to agree to the payoffs or else encounter significant delays in securing relief for class members. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 5:08 am
Judicial Panel Grants Plaintiff’s Request, Over Defense and Other Plaintiff Objection, for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2008, 4:54 am
The district court sought supplemental briefing as to whether plaintiff had standing to prosecute the class action complaint, and ultimately dismissed the class action on the ground that plaintiff had suffered no injury. [read post]