Search for: "thom"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 9:15 am
In December 2019, Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Representatives Ben Cline (R-VA), Martha Roby (R-AL), Theodore Deutch (R-FL) and Harley Rouda (D-CA) sent a letter to ALI stating that laws created through federal statute like copyright are “ill-suited for treatment in a Restatement” and threaten to muddle the law. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 9:15 am
Last week, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) announced that it is launching a campaign against Senator Thom Tillis’ (R-NC) proposed “Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2022,” which would effectively abrogate the Supreme Court’s decisions in Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm
Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) yesterday led a hearing of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property titled “Fraudulent Trademarks: How They Undermine the Trademark System and Harm American Consumers and Businesses. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:05 pm
Senate, his last several years as Republican Chief Counsel on the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual property, where he was responsible for planning and implementing Senator Thom Tillis’ (R-NC) and the Republican party's legislative agenda on all aspects of intellectual property. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Representatives Ben Cline (R-VA), Martha Roby (R-AL), Theodore Deutch (R-FL) and Harley Rouda (D-CA) sent a letter to ALI stating that laws created through federal statute like copyright are “ill-suited for treatment in a Restatement” and threaten to muddle the law. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 12:13 pm
In June of this year, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal replied to a late April request by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) for answers to a number of questions surrounding abuse of the inter partes review (IPR) system, explaining that she was working on the problem. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 8:36 am
House of Representatives passes the SBIR and STTR Extension Act to extend those two seed funding programs through fiscal year 2025; Micron announces a 50 percent reduction in wafer fab equipment capital expenditures to address high chip inventory issues; and Senator Chris Coons announces that he will co-sponsor Senator Thom Tillis’ patent eligibility act. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:15 am
As Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) rightly pointed out when introducing the legislation, “Patents provide a limited term monopoly against the public, and it’s in the public’s interest and benefit to know who owns that monopoly. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
From Professor Thom Giddens, Dundee Law School: For the first 2021 InterLaw Guest Lecture, Dundee Law School will be hosting Professor Katharina Pistor, Edwin B. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:30 am
Senate by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE). [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 9:15 am
On June 22, Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE) introduced the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act ("PERA") of 2023. [read post]
2 May 2025, 9:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Senators Thom Tillis and Chris Coons are part of bicameral, bipartisan coalitions reintroducing both PERA and the PREVAIL Act into Congress; the Eleventh Circuit affirms a jury verdict in a trademark infringement case after finding the damages within the range allowable by statute; the Federal Circuit rules that Fintiv’s patent claims are invalid for indefiniteness after finding the asserted claims to be means-plus-function claims; the EUIPO… [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:05 pm
Senate, his last several years as Republican Chief Counsel on the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual property, where he was responsible for planning and implementing Senator Thom Tillis’ (R-NC) and the Republican party's legislative agenda on all aspects of intellectual property. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:15 pm
On April 27, Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) and Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), both members of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, wrote to Kathi Vidal, the newly confirmed Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), to inquire as to why the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is allowing itself to become weaponized. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 12:15 pm
In December, Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) wrote a letter to President Biden asking Biden to withdraw Sohn’s nomination, explaining that her role as a co-founder of the open Internet advocacy group Public Knowledge poses a threat to copyright owners in particular. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 8:30 pm
Thom Tillis (R-NC), have been the motivating force for patent reform for almost a decade, primarily in their efforts to roll back legislative efforts and judicial decisions having negative effects on U.S. innovation and the patent system (see "Senator Coons And Co-Sponsors Introduce the PREVAIL Act"; "Senators Tillis and Coons Once More Attempt to Fix Patent Eligibility"; "Senate Bill Proposed to Provide Subject Matter Eligibility Solution"; "Senate… [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 9:15 am
On June 22, Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE) introduced the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act ("PERA") of 2023. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:58 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC), Tom Cotton (R-AR), and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) sent a letter to Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo (at right) to express their "grave concerns with the so called 'compromise' agreement to waive global intellectual property protections for Covid-19 vaccines. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:15 pm
On December 11, Senators Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE), sent a letter to United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Andrei Iancu inquiring about whether qualified women are excluded from membership in the patent bar as the result of systemic bias. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:15 pm
Then, on Thursday, Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC), Chris Coons (D-DE), with some help from their colleagues, introduced two new bills that would have major implications for patent eligibility law and PTAB practices, respectively. [read post]
