Search for: "v. Smith et al" Results 461 - 480 of 1,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 2:32 pm by J
A landlord is not usually liable for acts of nuisance by his tenants unless he has, for example, encouraged to approved of the nuisance behaviour: see Smith v Scott [1973] Ch 314; Hussain v Lancaster CC [2000] 1 QB 1 and Mowam v LB Wandsworth [2001] 33 HLR 56. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:32 pm by J
A landlord is not usually liable for acts of nuisance by his tenants unless he has, for example, encouraged to approved of the nuisance behaviour: see Smith v Scott [1973] Ch 314; Hussain v Lancaster CC [2000] 1 QB 1 and Mowam v LB Wandsworth [2001] 33 HLR 56. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 6:51 am by emagraken
Loo et al, 2007 BCSC 129 and Nanaimo Shipyard Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Consequently, with the exception of its ruling on the fee litigation issue, the district court's decision is AFFIRMED. 07a0491p.06 2007/12/18 Beattie, et al v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Department of the Interior et al. v. [read post]