Search for: "Activation Publishing, Inc."
Results 4781 - 4800
of 5,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am
The Foilies are published in partnership with the Association of Alternative Newsmedia. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm
I would like to thank Richie for allowing me to publish his article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
Please contact me directly if you would like to publish a guest post. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978),[1] much like FOIA requesters need have no particular reason to obtain government records. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a)(2): the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
I would like to thank John allowing me to publish his article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:02 am
August 1 marked the effective date of yet another Affordable Care Act mandate: the controversial contraceptive coverage and other women’s health preventive coverage benefits mandates. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
" That's a major win for Samsung and everyone with a balanced position on the issue.I'll now point to all of the amicus briefs filed in the first round (I'll do the same when Apple's backers file later this summer) and sum up what I consider to be their key points.Pro-Samsung brief #1: The Internet Association, The Software & Information Industry Association, Dell, eBay, Facebook, Garmin, Google, HP, Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Newegg, Pegasystems, Red Hat, SAS Institute,… [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:48 am
” Given the risks of litigation—including the nontrivial risk of losing at trial, as similar claims had done elsewhere (with the competing product Prevagen, for example, the jury was hung and the court decertified the class)—the magistrate recommended finding that settlement was fair, despite some objections, including from Truth in Advertising, Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
There is no question that in these matrimonial politics he did as he was told, though it is improbable that his private opinions on the issues in question in any way contradicted his public doings.More significant are his activities as archbishop in the reconstructed church. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
In a recently published paper, M. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:43 am
Bern Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
`Every person may freely speak, write, or publish sentiments on all subjects; being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech of the press. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
This article previously was published as a Seyfarth client alert. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
I would like to thank John for allowing me to publish his article as a guest post. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Chewey, Inc., OSHRC Docket No. 19-0868, 2022 WL 1009607 (February 22, 2022). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
According to that archive, the supposedly "original" blogspot post purports to have been published Jan. 30, 2024, more than three weeks before the Fourth Circuit opinion (which the post quotes) was released. [read post]
