Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 4781 - 4800 of 8,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2017, 4:48 am by Benjamin Wittes
Fitzgerald or whether it is personal conduct for which you might be subject to suit under Clinton v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:48 pm by Mark Bennett
Gov’t Code § 81.011(a), says that the State Bar is “an administrative agency of the judicial branch of government. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
” i) The Role and Importance of the Superior Court Canada’s system of parliamentary democracy has three branches, the executive, legislative and judicial. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:11 am by Richard Frank
County of Monterey case raises important and difficult questions for both the justices and the Executive Branch of California state government. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  Finally, in State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:56 am by Bob Kraft
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:41 am by Robert Kraft
Watts On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:10 am by Robert Kraft
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:52 am by Bob Kraft
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:19 am by James Romoser
A lifelong Federalist who opposed the Jeffersonian conception of democracy, Marshall broadly interpreted the powers of Congress and declared the supremacy of federal law over state law. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Russell Spivak
In putting the contingency claims forward, the government rests on the Supreme Court’s 1998 case Texas v. [read post]