Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 8,123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:42 pm
Petitioner relies heavily on Basardh v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:01 pm
By way of illustration, take a look at Sierra Club v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:07 am
Andre V. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:07 am
No – at least if the Supreme Court accepts that Government’s position in Zivotosfky v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 9:39 am
See Gravel v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:12 pm
See Collins v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:02 am
” 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am
”), and (2) that under the state constitution, there is no good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:27 am
In Raines v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Halbig v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Bank v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:20 am
: Congress v. the Supreme Court Damon Root, Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 6:59 am
While it affirmed summary judgment on her retaliation claim, her sex discrimination claim, in which she alleged that she was treated differently than a male coworker with whom she was having an affair when she was terminated and he was allowed to resign and continue working for an outside contractor, was also revived (Orton-Bell v State of Indiana, July 21, 2014, Manion, D). [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
Circuit’s decision in Halbig v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:17 am
However, the court also seemingly paved the way for future litigants to argue for different disparate impact standards under state vs. federal law (Pippen v State of Iowa, July 18, 2014, Appel, B). [read post]
