Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 6,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
" Five of the Justices in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 11:14 am
With cause, Gideon likes to quote this passage from Justice White's* opinion for a unanimous court in Coffin v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
It is both nerve racking and exhilarating to hear – from the wings – the commentators’ reactions to my efforts to animate the parade of characters and the raft of plots that constituted the highly theatrical worlds of nineteenth-century law and politics. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
EU v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
Marvel Comics, the legal battle for control over the comic-book characters created by artist Jack Kirby. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:45 am
” The Court continued: “That a state trial judge might be thought more likely than an administrative censor to determine accurately that a work is obscene does not change the unconstitutional character of the restraint if erroneously entered. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:04 pm
(See Cashion v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 11:27 am
Employment * White House: “State Call to Action on Non-Compete Agreement” * NY Times: To Compete Better, States Are Trying to Curb Noncompete Pacts * Quicken Loans, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm
As he wrote in dissent in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Starting in 1999, using Section 304 of the Copyright Act, Siegel’s heirs recaptured his rights to the Superman character. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Starting in 1999, using Section 304 of the Copyright Act, Siegel’s heirs recaptured his rights to the Superman character. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Ray v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 3:08 pm
State-of-the-art at the time was 78s. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
He also showed a wicked sense of humor in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am
I sometimes show short movie clips at the start of lecture classes too- I have shown short clips of relevant sections of "Eyes on the Prize" in my Con Law class on Brown v Board and affirmative action/Bakke- not sure it can be streamed but usually your law library will have or can ILL the DVDs- and some "Firing Line" clips of William F Buckley debating the ERA (these are on YouTube), etc.Elizabeth Pleck: Loving v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:27 am
”This judgment pre-dated the CJEU decisions in both Google France v LVMS (23 March 2010) and L’Oreal v eBay (12 July 2011). [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:53 pm
” State ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm
Braun v. [read post]
