Search for: "Childs v. State" Results 4781 - 4800 of 21,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2011, 8:19 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.) the District Court granted the petition for return. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:36 am
The independent-thinker phenomenon means that the child proudly states the decision to reject the alienated parent is his own, not influenced by the preferred parent. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am by Amy Howe
” Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the East Valley Tribune) discusses Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:23 pm
The Supreme Court issued its second round of summer recess orders Monday, but no action was taken on a plea by the state of Louisiana to reconsider the June 25 decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 9:02 am by Liisa Speaker
The Court of Appeals reversed the termination of Respondent-Mother’s parental rights to her minor child in In the Matter of V. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:00 am
” And if substantial evidence was found to exist, the court was not permitted to substitute its judgment for that of the agency’s, even if it would have arrived at a different result.Since the record reinforced that “the child's physical, mental, or emotional condition was impaired or in imminent danger of being impaired as result of being left alone, outside on a playground unsupervised and that the petitioner was one of the individuals responsible for the… [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 7:02 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
The Sixth Circuit's recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:06 pm by Steve
Today, the Virginia Supreme Court decided in Wyatt v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 2:11 am
8Circuit.png On habeas review of state trial concerning sexual abuse of a child, Eighth Circuit concludes video-taped testimonial statements of the minor to a police officer and social worker describing the details of the abuse were admissible despite the inability of the minor to recall the events during her trial testimony since she testified at trial and the defense was provided a full and fair opportunity to cross-examine her; the minor was not made… [read post]