Search for: "Crawford" Results 4781 - 4800 of 6,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2008, 12:50 pm
Justin Levitt searches for a silver lining (wearing his most rose-colored glasses, in my opinion); see also Justin's posts here and here) An alternative newspaper in Indianapolis finds someone who might make a good as applied plaintiff. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:05 pm
ACCA yesterday explored the Crawford v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 10:01 am
This Roll Call editorial ($) weighs in on what Congress should do in light of Crawford.... [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 9:59 am
Just when he's argued his positions taken at DOJ have been vindicated by the Supreme Court's decision in Crawford.... [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
Check out this second NPR report by Nina Totenberg. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court decided whether a state can require a voter to present a photo ID before casting a ballot (Crawford v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 9:26 pm
I’m not necessarily saying that Crawford was wrongly decided. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 8:46 pm
I will leave it to the likes of the incredible Rick Hasen and SCOTUSBlog's Lyle Deniston -- among many, many others -- to talk about the important election law elements of Monday's Supreme Court decision on voter identification in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
And WLF Chief Counsel Richard Samp’s analysis in More on Crawford: The Court Steps Back From Electoral Refereeing, which is published at SCOTUSblog, has a lot I agree with, especially this part, some of which is a more elegant version of what I said yesterday, I disagree with those who suggest that the Crawford shuts the courthouse door entirely, even to discrete groups of voters who can demonstrate that a nondiscriminatory election regulation imposes a disproportion… [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
Crawford (3) (4) 10,833 100,370 57,795 — 168,998 David W. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:43 am
As a result, judges and Justices with strong views on the merits (whether liberal, conservative or other) are tempted to manipulate the facial/as-applied question as a way of helping the case come out the way they want on the merits.The Roberts Court in the last year has been ESPECIALLY attentive to the facial/as-applied dichotomy, as the recent decisions in Baze (the lethal injection case) and Crawford (the Indiana voter ID case) illustrate. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
So what distinguishes Crawford from Harper? [read post]